After a pull request is merged or rejected, you can learn what went right and what went wrong. This skill helps you spot patterns in your code reviews. It looks at feedback from reviewers, checks if tests were missing, and finds ways to improve your next pull request. You get a short report each time so you can keep getting better over time.
The tool works with GitHub’s gh command and git. You run a few commands to find your recent pull requests, read the comments, and see if they were accepted or rejected. Then it saves a learning note with the date, the repo name, and what happened. This is useful for any developer who wants to avoid repeating the same mistakes and build stronger habits.
By reviewing your own contributions regularly, you can catch issues like too large a pull request, missing documentation, or ignored feedback. This makes you a better teammate and helps your whole team move faster. The skill works best when you use it after every important pull request or once a week to see your overall pattern.
Global
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/pr-retroProject
mkdir -p .claude/skills/pr-retroSource Repository
Improve Codebase Architecturemattpocock/skills
Scan your codebase for architecture improvements with visual reports and pick one to refactor
Web Design Guidelinesvercel-labs/agent-skills
Review your UI code for compliance with web interface guidelines
Caveman Reviewjuliusbrussee/caveman
Ultra-compressed one-line code review comments that cut noise
Zoom Outmattpocock/skills
Get a big picture view of your code with a simple map of modules and callers
Codebase Designmattpocock/skills
Create deep modules with tiny interfaces and lots of hidden logic for testability
Requesting Code Reviewobra/superpowers
Catch code issues early with focused automated reviews before every merge
Request Refactor Planmattpocock/skills
Plan safe code refactors with tiny commits and clear GitHub issues
Receiving Code Reviewobra/superpowers
Think first, then code. Verify feedback before making changes. Stay objective