Peer review is a way for scientists to check the quality of research papers and grant proposals. It uses a systematic process to look at methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, and ethics. This helps make sure the work is sound and honest.
Anyone who reviews manuscripts for journals or evaluates grant applications can use this skill. It gives clear steps to follow from the first reading to a final report. The goal is to give constructive feedback that helps authors improve their work.
This toolkit also checks if studies follow important reporting guidelines like CONSORT and PRISMA. It works across many scientific fields and makes the review process rigorous and fair.
Global
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/peer-reviewProject
mkdir -p .claude/skills/peer-reviewSource Repository
Lark Baselarksuite/cli
Simplify your Lark Base data with tables, fields, records, and views
Lark Wikilarksuite/cli
Manage your Lark Wiki spaces, members, and documents with simple commands
Grillingmattpocock/skills
Test your plan thoroughly with clear step-by-step interview questions
Analyze Projectlllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Safe read-only analysis of deep learning repos for understanding and risk detection
Ai Research Reproductionlllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Faithful reproduction of deep learning research with auditable steps and minimal changes
Repo Intake And Planlllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Scan a repo, find commands, and get a simple reproduction plan
Minimal Run And Auditlllllllama/rigorpilot-skills
Capture evidence from deep learning runs and create standardized audit reports
Obsidian Vaultmattpocock/skills
Search create and organize notes with wikilinks and index notes easily