A team of specialized judges can now review your completed work from multiple viewpoints. Each judge focuses on a different aspect like requirements, design, or code quality. They work independently then debate their findings to reach a shared consensus.
This review helps you catch hidden issues and improve your work. The judges use a structured process to verify their own critiques. You get a thorough report without automatic changes, so you can decide what to fix.
Global
mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/critiqueProject
mkdir -p .claude/skills/critiqueSource Repository
Improve Codebase Architecturemattpocock/skills
Scan your codebase for architecture improvements with visual reports and pick one to refactor
Web Design Guidelinesvercel-labs/agent-skills
Review your UI code for compliance with web interface guidelines
Caveman Reviewjuliusbrussee/caveman
Ultra-compressed one-line code review comments that cut noise
Zoom Outmattpocock/skills
Get a big picture view of your code with a simple map of modules and callers
Codebase Designmattpocock/skills
Create deep modules with tiny interfaces and lots of hidden logic for testability
Requesting Code Reviewobra/superpowers
Catch code issues early with focused automated reviews before every merge
Request Refactor Planmattpocock/skills
Plan safe code refactors with tiny commits and clear GitHub issues
Receiving Code Reviewobra/superpowers
Think first, then code. Verify feedback before making changes. Stay objective